* You see indlœg tagged with 'Twitter'

Managing and measuring activity and presence in social media

It is not because there is some industry standard for measuring the spread or impact on social media. There are many different proposals for what to measure and how. Basically you can make the collection of statistics on six areas:

1 Total number of views:

You can measure the number of page views, etc. on your blog, YouTube channel or individual video, Flickr, Facebook and more. You should set up different goals and work with different emphasis in relation to success criteria.

2 Connections / relationships

You can measure the number of relationships by looking at who has expressed an interest in your brand. For example. subscribers to your blog, fans on Facebook, Twitter Followers, YouTube friends and subscribers, LinkedIn group members and so on.

3 Engagement with the audience

You can measure the degree of activity with your audience by looking at who talks about your brand and it could, for example. include comments on the blog, is active on YouTube, Facebook and the like, @ tweets and retweets on Twitter, and your coverage of services that allows the user to judge you.

4 References from Social Media

You can measure the number of users coming from social media to your website. It is interesting to see which sites provide the greatest traffic and add them if necessary. individually to your analysis tools. Be aware that traffic can get through your own efforts / channel or the efforts of others / who has mentioned your brand. To strengthen your knowledge in this area, so it makes sense to insert tracking where you have control over the link.

5 Conversion via Social Media

After sending traffic from social media to your site there should be a transaction / action. Therefore, this conversion interesting to measure in order to improve your marketing / product / etc. This is the bottom line is affected and where the management finally convinced social media opportunities.

6 Your engagement

Finally, you should also keep statistics on your own involvement. It concerns the number of blog posts, contributions to external blogs, comments, Facebook updates, Tweets, retweets, new videos on YouTube, powerpoint presentations on Slideshare, and so on.

Weighting effect is very different. But this is in my eyes the six areas to be measured so that you can keep statistics on your company's activity and presence on social media.

What is your starting point on Social Media?

It's on everyone's lips. In the boardrooms, among your privates colleagues in professional journals, morning newspapers and on television, we hear about Facebook, Twitter, YouTube, openness, dialogue, viral marketing, lack of skills, risk management, prohibiting the use of services during working hours and so on.

The market has exploded over the past three years, where almost all leaves clear traces of life on the Internet. A distinction is rarely between individual users' behavior here could stairs from Ground Well else do much good.

And now that users have made services like Facebook and YouTube to himself as follows companies. The idea is to fish where the fish are. There are many guides on how you as a company purely practical get started on social media. And there are also a number of people who have made it their livelihood to help companies to "optimize" the presence.

It is far from easy, there are very warm air, even more opinions and ideas. And then it's all new and exciting. And it is certain that it is wrong, but it would be nice if these can be minimized in size and consistency.

The last three years I studied with at more than 100 blogs about social media and the Internet generally. It's not as much time as some others in the industry, but it is long enough to be able to summarize the key (part-) conclusions about corporate behavior on the Internet.


GROUNDS FOR BEING on social media

Dialog

What you would normally use social media in private? You read, share knowledge and talk with friends and acquaintances through comments, messages or maybe games. It is under the assumptions that we as companies should act in the services. The media can be something other than print and TV. And therefore expect the user of the media, that we make use of these opportunities. One of the key parts here is that communication also goes the other way: Your company on a social media has not had a new, traditional marketing channel. You must expect that it is the user who has something to tell you.

Long term commitment

You may be lucky to get a viral hit, making your brand known everywhere in an incredibly short time. But it should not be what you build your strategy. It's about to dedicate themselves in the long term. To build up a foundation that ensures that you can handle both good and less good times for your business.

Honesty

It goes without saying. And it's not because I expect companies to outright lying. But they do. The problem with lies is that they often revealed. And there's a long-term unemployed person who feels unfairly treated, or an exceptionally dedicated, which has got into his head to arrive at the truth, then it comes out. The network on the web is invisible and can be huge once the story spread among friends, friends of friends.

Transparency

Therefore you should introduce yourself and your interests. The more that is hidden or concealed, the more reason to distrust and desire for disclosure. Not only among journalists but certainly also in the individual citizen.
In return, you can win loyalty, increase your credibility to your products and create a long lasting value around your brand. And precisely this strengthens your position at the time when you need it. For example. if you unwarranted or justified in coming storm in the social or traditional media.

Sincere interest

Be present and give something of yourself. You are in a sea of ​​information and if you want to be more relevant than your competitor, you must talk to your users - or the individual user - with an interest in just them / him / her. Emotions, logic, intelligence, humor are all ways to get to people, but do it for their sake. If you show interest in them personally, so they may never discover who you are talking to.


ISSUES

Presence of social media is far from smooth. If I were to summarize some of the issues, then the following seven aspects:

Noise

It is inconceivable many speak at once. About the same. If anything differently. Importance can be difficult to discern. Make yourself aware of how you and your business can stand out from the crowd through, among other relevance. Relevance can be used for noise and give positive attention and feedback.

Amateurism

Your clients can be experienced Internet users as well as beginners. But common to them is that their behavior is characterized by amateurism. They bought the social media story about the easy registration of three steps and has otherwise used the media ever since without reading manuals or situation is seldom conscious of the service.

Businesses on the other hand, act on other terms and must be professional. Therefore, there is embedded a potential conflict. A tip would be to take customers seriously. It's like the football player in Serie fifth He knows that he is not Michael Laudrup, but that he should be commended for its good pass or a free kick if he kicks back on the football field.

Cultural paradigm shift

Power is transferred to the participants. 30 years ago was a media tool to spread its message among the masses. You and the news media controlled the flow of information, details, angles, timing and follow-up. The Internet in general has changed this for the longest and social media have enhanced the ability to build bridges and create networks between people in a way that has not been seen before. There can therefore rightly speaks of a cultural paradigm shift. And, both the former rulers to contend, as well as the participants will also learn to handle their newfound influence and power.

Lack of standards

There is no set uniform standards and often, companies resort to self-defining goals. If they do, when this far. Lacking the means to measure that is not defined and established recognized methods, for example. provide comparability, and finally, companies ask themselves what realistic and successful goal in these media? The question you should always ask themselves the independent media, but the answer you will find in this case, rarely looking at others or previous attempts.

Shortage of talent

I heard one ask where the humorous, empathetic, committed and disarming, experienced and skilled communicators exist. And they exist. On Twitter, it does not take long to find the most catchy (prominent?) Who have good ideas, have a good grasp of communication and may have done it for their livelihood. But it does not change the amount of talent is to overlook - locally and globally - in comparison to the number of companies that are on the way out on social media.

Technological change

We need no more than 2 years back to watch MySpace being overtaken by Facebook in Denmark and for even shorter time since worldwide. Development of smart phones are revolutionizing this second Danish their mobile habits. Where are we in 2 years?
Technological change and opportunities for improvement has never been faster. It has been a premise we live with; escalation has been a matter of course. But it is still important to keep in mind that aspect of your participation in one thing and another.

Risk of over hype

For there is a risk of over-hype. Second Life was on everyone's lips very short time but was really foretold great opportunities. Twitter has not really been felt widely, although it is now over 3 years ago, the Danes began to create profiles on the latest new.
Deal with your new service with reason and coolness. Some services might appeal to your particular business, eg. foursquare has appealed to Starbucks and the like, because the potential for more sales to existing customers is obvious. And then invest your time there, being a first mover can provide a strong market position. Other times you will have the advantage of waiting for service reaches a critical mass of users.


For there is really much to grasp, once you get started.

Trends in 2010 and

INTRODUCTION
As with trends, so we already have seen tendencies to something develops. For example. ecology has been through several phases. Initially, sustainability was in itself a trend. Today it is how sustainability contextualise them. Likewise, it was to be connected online (social networking) a trend. In the future trend about how the behavior we have on social networks mingle with other online and offline activities. Forrester has also done a really good analysis of the history of (social)

TREND: BUSINESS AS EXCESSIVE
Sustainability has been and is still a trend. More than ever before, a company must demonstrate good citizenship and community benefit. Companies must behave as transparent and be as open as people are on line. The conversation must be cultivated to a greater extent rather than the traditional one-way communication (which include TV era to). And companies must expect that success comes through cooperation with the consumer rather than working with an us / them schism.

TREND: TRACK & ALARMS
Maybe you can approach them to lay track (tracking) and get alerts (alerts) as the new "search". On the one hand it is a way to manage our hunger for information. On the other hand, it saves time, we forget a lesser degree thing and it gives us a level of control.
An alarm can be used so that it is the consumer who finds a particular product, but that takes the consumer with the relevant preferences.
Twitter and similar services can play a role in the upbringing and behavior of the users, while Augment Reality adds a new dimension. Digg and delicious was probably a sort of Tracking 1.0. Tracking 2.0 is on its way and an important part of the filter is necessary to succeed in the vast streams of information.

TREND: REALTIME Review
As a result of the life people live in the moment together with the desire to express themselves about all things from his own perspective, the amount of reviews and comments for products will increase. The speed will be so fast that we get access to knowledge about our potential acquisitions, experiences, events and much more in the 'now' (not only in the morning). The Internet supports the individual consumer power and we are ready to use it (lots of individual cases). Why? Because it is easy and requires few resources.

TREND: MASS MEETING
Mass communication has matured and takes Internet features with it. From being one-way to be multi-way technology offers us new opportunities to meet in a new level. The media has predicted will save us away inside the home, leads us then to get out more. Why? Because social media first and foremost about people. Life Streaming becomes clearer, more widespread and open for questions to rethink privacy and control.
One of the technologies, r which has helped in developing the mobile phone and it will continue to be a bridge builder between being online and offline.
There will be more spontaneous, temporary meetings between strangers, groups or even a lot of common interests, hobbies, political preferences, a common good cause, and protests. And these mass gatherings will attract public attention. Another element is democratizing power.

TREND: MATURE Materialism
The trend has been dubbed in English 'maturalisme'. Our everyday life is permeated by material things. But as people in a mature consumer society we no longer tolerate being treated like we were last decade uninformed, easily provoked, inexperienced consumers who opt for the golden middle.
The trend supports the conversation between consumer and company. Education of the consumer to maximize the yield of product is a key to blending. Easiest and most difficult is it enough to create a platform for consumers to even be able to help each other.
But it is clear that to overcome the mature consumer, so must companies be transparent and open, as the consumer himself.

TREND: ONLINE PROFILE MINING
Actually, the term in English MYning from the idea of ​​a 'me'. The super exciting here are issues related to ownership and profit on my online profile.
As consumers, we would like to publish our interest in buying. But who makes the mainstream companies to offer us exactly what we have said we are interested in?
The personal online profile has a value. It can be emotional in comparison with its own private surroundings and in relation to financial companies. There will be raised interesting questions for the next few years about the protection of profiles, data storage, legal handling in connection with accident and death.

TREND: (f) LUXURY

Luxury is what you want it to be.

And thus the word 'fluksus', that is to be in motion. First, I define what I think is luxury. Then I invoke my authority to declare this. And finally I frames the right audience and get expressions back to it's true: It's damn luxury!
It's about the uniqueness rather than the biggest and most expensive. Exclusivity may be the password. It may be a limited location (which is outside e-shop shall limitlessness). And it must be like to be transitory, so there is a time constraint, which increases the value of luxury. Time is not something you and I have plenty of that today?

TREND: INCORPORATED CHARITY
With the incorporated charity, I believe that a donation from the company activated by the consumer's action with the company. Today companies create a social profile (Corporate Social Responsibility) to support a particular good cause - and the value must be added to the product (economic as well as image).
In the future we also expect that the consumer has to choose what company should donate to. Social Vibe is an example. But when we're through phases and all companies offer donations, so the difference will lie in the value and identity, which is in the individual donation. And who is doing the easiest and most meaningful to the consumer in that situation the consumer is when the product or service acquired.

Sources and further reading: http://www.trendwatching.com/

Obama: My impression of an accessible president

Obama's use of the Internet as a platform to get closer to the voters was massive and successful in my eyes. His use of Youtube, Flickr, Facebook and Twitter are definitely approved. He presence gives an impression of accessibility and popular culture without compromising the role as world leader an American president must always carry with them.

See a few selected pictures here: http://mashable.com/2009/04/29/obama-flickr/

Youtube channels:
http://www.youtube.com/barackobama
http://www.youtube.com/whitehouse

Flickr:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/barackobamadotcom
http://www.flickr.com/photos/whitehouse

Facebook:
http://www.facebook.com/barackobama
http://www.facebook.com/group.php?gid=2231653698
http://www.facebook.com/WhiteHouse

Twitter:
http://twitter.com/barackobama
http://twitter.com/WhiteHouse

Dialogue is a good thing. But there must also acts on the table. And it comes. A discussion on Open Government 'Initiative possibilities for how technology can help people get access to relevant information. Data.gov was launched in the spring and Sunlight Labs printed shortly after a competition to create applications for the interpretation of data as they become more accessible and understandable for the population.

In Denmark there is a way to go yet, though Lars Lokke have both Flickr account is on Facebook and Twitter . A really good local idea is the unofficial channel Twitter Thing . Respect.

Get (well) started with Twitter

Twitter - http://www.twitter.com/ - has been known in Denmark quite long by now. The first time I heard about the service was probably about Google's acquisition of Jaiku back in October 2007. Immediately defendants' mobile microblogging "me not very much, I was missing so much an incentive to jump on the wave. I thought if I could follow Klaus Riskjær, Anders Lund Madsen and Jelved, so it might be interesting to join.

Via Search Engine Journal , one of the innumerable blogs I follow , I read about WeFollow . WeFollow is a relatively new service that lists the most followed Twitter users in various categories. Content is of course user-created and the site is quite manageable as opposed to Twellow (perhaps the name is a reference to the Yellow Pages?).

Barack Obama is second only to CNN Breaking News, but Britney Spears follows closely in the list of the most followed on Twitter.

There is an interview with Lance Armstrong on TechChrunch about using Twitter.
Mikkel Demib recommend you to book your Twitter user account before someone else takes your username. (Thinking about making a mash-up site about football, then the user name available on del.icio.us, vimeo, flickr and FriendFeed ...)

At Checkusersnames.com that myself recently made ​​use of, you can use one call to see if your username is available on many different services. It may be you'll need it. Mikkel Demib also draws attention to the ability to follow subjects up for Twitter users by using their search engine to see what people write about such. Anders Lund Madsen or who is fun right now .

See if any. a little short video about what Twitter is from common craft , if you're brand new ...